Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.
This text of 247 A.D. 867 (Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order with notice of entry, upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [158 Misc. 904.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zelenko-v-gimbel-bros-nyappdiv-1936.