Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.
247 A.D. 867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of order with notice of entry, upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [158 Misc. 904.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros., 247 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 867 (Zelenko v. Gimbel Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beadell v. Eros Mgt. Reality, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 02496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Walsh v. Town of Cheektowaga
237 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Acosta v. Fuentes
150 Misc. 2d 1013 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
Kalikas v. Artale
124 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Randolph v. City of New York
117 A.D.2d 44 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Parvi v. City of Kingston
41 N.Y. 553 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Wolf v. City of New York
349 N.E.2d 858 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Rockwell v. State
32 Misc. 2d 167 (New York State Court of Claims, 1962)
De Sessa v. City of White Plains
30 Misc. 2d 817 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Bernard v. Village of Andover
8 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Wojcik v. Aluminum Co. of America
18 Misc. 2d 740 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Clark v. State
195 Misc. 581 (New York State Court of Claims, 1949)