Zeko v. Gleason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zeko v. Gleason

97 So. 2d 623

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 22, 1957

DocketNo. 57-56

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 So. 2d 623 (Zeko v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeko v. Gleason, 97 So. 2d 623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this court. From all these it appears that the chancellor below based his finding upon conflicting evidence, and following the rule so often enunciated that “the findings of a chancellor, based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous,” and finding no reversible error in the record, we conclude that the cause should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this court. From all these it appears that the chancellor below based his finding upon conflicting evidence, and following the rule so often enunciated that “the findings of a chancellor, based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous,” and finding no reversible error in the record, we conclude that the cause should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 2d 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeko-v-gleason-fladistctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack