Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko

Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko

245 A.D.2d 1070, 666 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13840
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 1070 (Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko, 245 A.D.2d 1070, 666 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that Chong Zeilnhofer (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, DePetres v Kaiser, 244 AD2d 851; Nigro v Penree, 238 AD2d 908; Thomas v Hulslander, 233 AD2d 567). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Hulslander
233 A.D.2d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Nigro v. Penree
238 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
DePetres v. Kaiser
244 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 1070, 666 N.Y.S.2d 77, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeilnhofer-v-marcinko-nyappdiv-1997.