Zeilmann v. McCullough

63 A. 368, 214 Pa. 27, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 589
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 12, 1906·No. Appeal, No. 265·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff was a driver of some years’ experience, and had driven this particular log truck, according to his own testimony, “ three times, anyhow — three or four times before I met with this accident. ... I only took one six-ton column that morning. . . . How many days before that time ? Well, it was about two days, anyhow.”

Whatever of danger there was in such use of the truck was as apparent to plaintiff as to anyone else, and he took the risk.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zeilmann v. McCullough, 63 A. 368, 214 Pa. 27, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 589 (Pa. 1906).

63 A. 368 (Zeilmann v. McCullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smoak v. City of Tampa
167 So. 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Reilly v. Philadelphia Suburban Gas & Electric Co.
145 A. 576 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)