Zeilander v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zeilander v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America

54 A.D.2d 696, 387 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14261

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 696 (Zeilander v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeilander v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America, 54 A.D.2d 696, 387 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 1976, which directed it to appear for an examination before trial by a person having knowledge of the facts. Application by defendant to withdraw the appeal denied. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examination shall proceed at the place set forth in the order under review, at a time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiffs, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Special circumstances existed which warranted Special Term’s refusal to afford defendant priority in examining plaintiffs (see CPLR 3103, subd [a]; Jeshion v Holzer, 13 AD2d 621). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 1976, which directed it to appear for an examination before trial by a person having knowledge of the facts. Application by defendant to withdraw the appeal denied. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The examination shall proceed at the place set forth in the order under review, at a time to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiffs, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. Special circumstances existed which warranted Special Term’s refusal to afford defendant priority in examining plaintiffs (see CPLR 3103, subd [a]; Jeshion v Holzer, 13 AD2d 621). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 696, 387 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeilander-v-prudential-life-insurance-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack