Zeigler v. Zenith Home Loans
This text of 17 F. App'x 696 (Zeigler v. Zenith Home Loans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
William and Robbie Zeigler appeal pro se the district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of the judgment dismissing their civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion, see School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm because none of the potential grounds for relief are present, see id. at 1263.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. App'x 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeigler-v-zenith-home-loans-ca9-2001.