Zeigler v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sean Zeigler,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 1:18cv580
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution, Judge Michael R. Barrett
Respondent.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 16, 2022 (Doc. 29). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 29) have been filed, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 29) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Petition as amended is dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, the Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, and this Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and
1 should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zeigler v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution (Zeigler v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.