Zeigler v. State

73 So. 3d 828, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16975, 2011 WL 5061159
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zeigler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15193
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2011·No. No. 4D07-4146·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Armando Zeigler, appeals his convictions for aggravated battery with a firearm, burglary while armed with a firearm and burglary with a battery. Zeigler raises three issues on appeal, the first two of which we affirm without discussion.

[829]*829In his third issue, Zeigler argues that his dual convictions for burglary while armed with a firearm and burglary with a battery occurred in a single incident of entry into the vehicle and therefore violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. We agree. See Docanto v. State, 811 So.2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (because there was only one entry, dual convictions for burglary with a battery and burglary while armed cannot stand).

Affirmed in part; Reversed in part and Remanded with instructions that the trial court vacate one of the burglary convictions and sentences.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zeigler v. State, 73 So. 3d 828, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16975, 2011 WL 5061159 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

73 So. 3d 828 (Zeigler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Docanto v. State
811 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)