Zeigler v. Ohlhaber

Supreme Court of Florida

Zeigler v. Ohlhaber

121 So. 573, 97 Fla. 524, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 938

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 10, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon tire transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there *525 is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon tire transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there *525 is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Zeigler v. Ohlhaber, 121 So. 573, 97 Fla. 524, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 938 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 573 (Zeigler v. Ohlhaber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.