Zeigler v. Morgenthau

119 A.D.2d 454, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55409

This text of 119 A.D.2d 454 (Zeigler v. Morgenthau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zeigler v. Morgenthau, 119 A.D.2d 454, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, the petition seeking a writ prohibiting respondents from fur[455]*455ther prosecution of petitioner under indictment No. 852/83 is granted.

The Court of Appeals having adopted the reasoning in the dissenting memorandum of then Justice Fritz W. Alexander, II (99 AD2d 989, 990-991), that there was no manifest necessity for the Trial Judge’s decision to grant a mistrial, and having remitted to this court for entry of an order, we order that the petition be granted and the indictment dismissed. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Carro and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zeigler v. Morgenthau
99 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.2d 454, 500 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeigler-v-morgenthau-nyappdiv-1986.