Zeigler v. Brown

5 Ky. Op. 716, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 338
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 5, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 716 (Zeigler v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zeigler v. Brown, 5 Ky. Op. 716, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 338 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

There was no service of process on Susan W. Zeigler upon the cross-petitions of either George N. Brown and James M. Rice, or George N. Brown and C. Cecil, assignees of Hodges, or Over-ton Price. Yet a general judgment subjecting Mrs. Zeigler's estate to1 the payment of their claims as well as that of appellee Means was rendered.

According to the provisions of Section 125, Civil Code, none of these parties were entitled to judgment on their cross-petitions until the defendants therein has been first summoned, either actually or constructively.

The judgment must be reversed as to all the plaintiffs on cross-petitions. No appeal is prosecuted from the judgment in favor of Means. It should not, however, be enforced until the claims of said plaintiffs shall have been finally disposed of, or until reasonable time has been given them to prepare their cross-actions for trial.

The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ky. Op. 716, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeigler-v-brown-kyctapp-1872.