Zeiger v. C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust

Missouri Court of Appeals

Zeiger v. C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust

226 S.W.3d 888, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 908, 2007 WL 1746911

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2007·No. No. ED 88359·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial in this premises-liability action, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Scott Zeiger, and against the defendant, C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust. The defendant trust now appeals, contending that the plaintiff failed to make a submissi-ble case and impermissibly injected the issue of insurance before the jury. We [889] affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial in this premises-liability action, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Scott Zeiger, and against the defendant, C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust. The defendant trust now appeals, contending that the plaintiff failed to make a submissi-ble case and impermissibly injected the issue of insurance before the jury. We [889] affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Zeiger v. C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust, 226 S.W.3d 888, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 908, 2007 WL 1746911 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

226 S.W.3d 888 (Zeiger v. C. David & Laura Zeiger Living Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.