Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Rich
393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 948, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2199
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (61 AD2d 922).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Rich, 393 N.E.2d 1042, 47 N.Y.2d 948, 419 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2199 (N.Y. 1979).
393 N.E.2d 1042 (Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Rich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Lelakis
943 F. Supp. 300 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Kuang Hsung Chuang
690 F. Supp. 192 (S.D. New York, 1988)