Home/New York Court of Appeals/Zehnick v. Meadowbrook II Associates

Zehnick v. Meadowbrook II Associates

842 N.E.2d 22, 5 N.Y.3d 873, 808 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3266
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 842 N.E.2d 22 (Zehnick v. Meadowbrook II Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zehnick v. Meadowbrook II Associates, 842 N.E.2d 22, 5 N.Y.3d 873, 808 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3266 (N.Y. 2005).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that reversed so much of Supreme Court’s order as granted appellant’s motion to amend her complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 N.E.2d 22, 5 N.Y.3d 873, 808 N.Y.S.2d 136, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zehnick-v-meadowbrook-ii-associates-ny-2005.