Zehfus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zehfus v. State

935 So. 2d 586, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 2006 WL 2190554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 4, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-471

StatusPublished

This text of 935 So. 2d 586 (Zehfus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zehfus v. State, 935 So. 2d 586, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 2006 WL 2190554 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

“The remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850.” Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245 (Fla.2004); see also Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

“The remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850.” Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245 (Fla.2004); see also Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

935 So. 2d 586, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 2006 WL 2190554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zehfus-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack