Zehfus v. State
935 So. 2d 586, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 2006 WL 2190554
Opinion
“The remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850.” Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245 (Fla.2004); see also Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zehfus v. State, 935 So. 2d 586, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13101, 2006 WL 2190554 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
935 So. 2d 586 (Zehfus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finley v. State
394 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)