Zeh v. Zeh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zeh v. Zeh

752 So. 2d 79, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1481, 2000 WL 193051

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2000

DocketNo. 5D99-2041

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 752 So. 2d 79 (Zeh v. Zeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeh v. Zeh, 752 So. 2d 79, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1481, 2000 WL 193051 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

We find little fault in the trial court’s handling of this most difficult dissolution. We agree with the wife, however, that the provisions relating to equitable distribution are confusing and contradictory and we reverse and remand for clarification.

On the one hand, the judgment provides that the husband is awarded all assets in the marital home. In another provision, however, the court awards both parties assets from a detailed schedule which includes assets contained within the home. Further, the judgment relieves the husband from any medical expenses to Florida Hospital, either before or after separation, and yet Schedule A, incorporated in the judgment, lists expenses to Florida Hospital as the husband’s obligation.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for clarification of the equitable distribution.

ANTOON, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI