Zeesman v. Hobbs

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Zeesman v. Hobbs

249 S.E.2d 697, 147 Ga. App. 644, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2882

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 18, 1978

Docket56779

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 697 (Zeesman v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeesman v. Hobbs, 249 S.E.2d 697, 147 Ga. App. 644, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2882 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying the appellant’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding a Mistrial. Inasmuch as the case is still pending in trial court and appellant did not comply with Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 (Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2)), this appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur. Benjamin Zeesman, pro se. Richard B. Thornton, James B. McLaughlin, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying the appellant’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding a Mistrial. Inasmuch as the case is still pending in trial court and appellant did not comply with Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act, as amended (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073 (Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2)), this appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur. Benjamin Zeesman, pro se. Richard B. Thornton, James B. McLaughlin, Jr., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 S.E.2d 697, 147 Ga. App. 644, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeesman-v-hobbs-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack