Zeesman v. Cordele Credit Jewelry, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Zeesman v. Cordele Credit Jewelry, Inc.

164 S.E.2d 729, 224 Ga. 732, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 924

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 7, 1968

Docket24869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 729 (Zeesman v. Cordele Credit Jewelry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeesman v. Cordele Credit Jewelry, Inc., 164 S.E.2d 729, 224 Ga. 732, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 924 (Ga. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Frankum, Justice.

The notice of appeal in this case was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Crisp [733]*733County on July 12, 1968. Each order, judgment and ruling appealed from was entered more than sixty days before the notice of appeal was filed, except the judgment dated and entered June 12, 1968, whereby the court overruled the appellant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint, his plea in abatement, and denied his motion for a summary judgment. No ruling made in that judgment is reviewable by direct appeal without a certificate having been issued by the trial judge, as provided by law, regarding immediate review. Code Ann. § 81A-156 (h) (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). The record does not contain a certificate of the trial judge with respect to any of the rulings aforesaid so as to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. Therefore, the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Argued October 14, 1968 Decided November 7, 1968. Benjamin Zeesman, for appellant. Wright & Reddick, George P. Wright, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankum, Justice.

The notice of appeal in this case was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Crisp [733]*733County on July 12, 1968. Each order, judgment and ruling appealed from was entered more than sixty days before the notice of appeal was filed, except the judgment dated and entered June 12, 1968, whereby the court overruled the appellant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint, his plea in abatement, and denied his motion for a summary judgment. No ruling made in that judgment is reviewable by direct appeal without a certificate having been issued by the trial judge, as provided by law, regarding immediate review. Code Ann. § 81A-156 (h) (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). The record does not contain a certificate of the trial judge with respect to any of the rulings aforesaid so as to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal. Therefore, the appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Argued October 14, 1968 Decided November 7, 1968. Benjamin Zeesman, for appellant. Wright & Reddick, George P. Wright, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E.2d 729, 224 Ga. 732, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeesman-v-cordele-credit-jewelry-inc-ga-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack