Home/New York Supreme Court/Zeely v. Yansen

Zeely v. Yansen

2 Johns. 386
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 Johns. 386 (Zeely v. Yansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zeely v. Yansen, 2 Johns. 386 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

The power of awarding a ¿aZes is incident to a court of justice, and essentiafto its proceédings. By -the first section of the act, every justice is invested with all the power usual in courts of record, for the purpose of hearing and trying causes; and the power of awarding a tales, in case of aMefault of the jurors summoned on t.he venire, is a power usual in courts of record. The justice was, therefore, right in ^’awarding a tales; and the judgment below .must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
174 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Boardman v. Thompson
25 Iowa 487 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Fenner v. Dickey
8 F. Cas. 1138 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1861)
Demeritt v. Miles
22 N.H. 523 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1851)
Gray v. . Hook
4 N.Y. 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Sharp v. Teese
9 N.J.L. 353 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeely-v-yansen-nysupct-1807.