Zeely v. Yansen
2 Johns. 386
Opinion
The power of awarding a ¿aZes is incident to a court of justice, and essentiafto its proceédings. By -the first section of the act, every justice is invested with all the power usual in courts of record, for the purpose of hearing and trying causes; and the power of awarding a tales, in case of aMefault of the jurors summoned on t.he venire, is a power usual in courts of record. The justice was, therefore, right in ^’awarding a tales; and the judgment below .must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zeely v. Yansen, 2 Johns. 386 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
2 Johns. 386 (Zeely v. Yansen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
174 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Boardman v. Thompson
25 Iowa 487 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Fenner v. Dickey
8 F. Cas. 1138 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1861)
Demeritt v. Miles
22 N.H. 523 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1851)
Gray v. . Hook
4 N.Y. 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Sharp v. Teese
9 N.J.L. 353 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1828)