Zdrojeski v. Dineen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zdrojeski v. Dineen

268 A.D. 877, 50 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 877 (Zdrojeski v. Dineen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zdrojeski v. Dineen, 268 A.D. 877, 50 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Superintendent of Insurance suspending for six months petitioner’s license as an insurance broker. The reason assigned for the suspension was that it had been determined after investigation and hearing that appellant was untrustworthy, within the contemplation of the Insurance Law, to act as an insurance broker. Appellant admitted that he had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for violating the National Housing Act Amendments of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 12, § 1701 et seq.), and pleaded guilty to the charge. Determination of the Superintendent of Insurance unanimously confirmed, without costs, the period of suspension to commence November 1, 1944, and terminate April 30, 1945. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the State Superintendent of Insurance suspending for six months petitioner’s license as an insurance broker. The reason assigned for the suspension was that it had been determined after investigation and hearing that appellant was untrustworthy, within the contemplation of the Insurance Law, to act as an insurance broker. Appellant admitted that he had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for violating the National Housing Act Amendments of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 12, § 1701 et seq.), and pleaded guilty to the charge. Determination of the Superintendent of Insurance unanimously confirmed, without costs, the period of suspension to commence November 1, 1944, and terminate April 30, 1945. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 877, 50 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zdrojeski-v-dineen-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack