Zazuri v. Plitt, No. Cv87 24 30 27 (Jun. 14, 1991)
This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4831 (Zazuri v. Plitt, No. Cv87 24 30 27 (Jun. 14, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"It is well settled that the day of the act from which a future time is to be ascertained is to be excluded from the computation." Lambert v. Stamford,
In accordance with Conn. Gen. Stats.
Conn. Gen. Stats.
The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
BALLEN, JUDGE CT Page 4832
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zazuri-v-plitt-no-cv87-24-30-27-jun-14-1991-connsuperct-1991.