Zazueta De Muniz v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit

Zazueta De Muniz v. Gonzales

458 F. App'x 639

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 2011

Docket04-72976

StatusUnpublished

This text of 458 F. App'x 639 (Zazueta De Muniz v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zazueta De Muniz v. Gonzales, 458 F. App'x 639 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Eva Luz Zazueta de Muniz petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of her motion to reopen the proceedings wherein she was ordered removed in absentia. We dismiss the petition.

The sole issue Zazueta raises here is a claim regarding advisals before she made a statement to an immigration inspector, but that issue was not exhausted because it was not raised before the BIA. We, therefore, will not consider the issue. See Puga v. Chertoff, 488 F.3d 812, 815-16 (9th Cir.2007); Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004); Taniguchi v. Schultz, 303 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir.2002); see also Castillo-Villagra v. INS, 972 F.2d 1017, 1023-24 (9th Cir.1992).

Petition DISMISSED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI