Zayzhon Thompson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

2023 Ark. 170
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 30, 2023
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 Ark. 170 (Zayzhon Thompson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zayzhon Thompson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, 2023 Ark. 170 (Ark. 2023).

Opinion

Cite as 2023 Ark. 170 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-424

Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ZAYZHON THOMPSON APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; APPELLEE’S MOTION TO V. DISMISS APPEAL; PRO SE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; PRO SE DEXTER PAYNE, DIRECTOR, MOTION TO MAKE A RULING ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF [NO. 40CV-23-13] CORRECTION APPELLEE HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED; PRO SE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOOT; PRO SE MOTION TO MAKE A RULING MOOT.

COURTNEY RAE HUDSON, Associate Justice

Appellant Zayzhon Thompson appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas

corpus filed pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-112-101 (Repl. 2016). The

circuit court dismissed Thompson’s petition for the writ because he was incarcerated in

Lincoln County when he initially filed his petition but was transferred to another unit before

the court entered its order. Specifically, Thompson had been transferred to the Grimes Unit

in Jackson County at the time the circuit court dismissed his petition on the basis of lack of

personal jurisdiction. In lieu of filing a responsive brief, appellee has filed a motion to dismiss

the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, a request for an extension of time

to file its responsive brief. Thompson has filed a pro se motion for default judgment on the basis of appellee’s failure to timely file a response, and a pro se motion to make a ruling

wherein he requests habeas relief. We grant the motion to dismiss, which renders

Thompson’s motion for default judgment and motion to make a ruling moot.

Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly

addressed to the circuit court located in the county where the prisoner is held in custody

unless the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code

Annotated sections 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2016). Perry v. State, 2018 Ark. 14, 535

S.W.3d 264. Although a circuit court may have subject-matter jurisdiction to issue the writ,

a court does not have personal jurisdiction to issue and make returnable before itself a writ

of habeas corpus to release a petitioner held in another county. Id. Arkansas Code Annotated

section 16-112-105(b)(1) (Repl. 2016) requires that the writ be directed to the person in

whose custody the petitioner is detained. Id. Accordingly, although Thompson was

incarcerated in Lincoln County when he filed the habeas petition, a writ of habeas corpus

issued by the Lincoln County Circuit Court could not be returned because he is no longer

within its jurisdiction. Id.

Appeal dismissed; pro se motion for default judgment moot; pro se motion to make

a ruling moot.

Zayzhon Thompson, pro se appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Jacob H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JOE PERRY, JR. v. STATE OF ARKANSAS
2018 Ark. 14 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ark. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zayzhon-thompson-v-dexter-payne-director-arkansas-department-of-ark-2023.