Zayzhon Thompson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
This text of 2023 Ark. 170 (Zayzhon Thompson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2023 Ark. 170 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-424
Opinion Delivered: November 30, 2023 ZAYZHON THOMPSON APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; APPELLEE’S MOTION TO V. DISMISS APPEAL; PRO SE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; PRO SE DEXTER PAYNE, DIRECTOR, MOTION TO MAKE A RULING ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF [NO. 40CV-23-13] CORRECTION APPELLEE HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE
APPEAL DISMISSED; PRO SE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOOT; PRO SE MOTION TO MAKE A RULING MOOT.
COURTNEY RAE HUDSON, Associate Justice
Appellant Zayzhon Thompson appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas
corpus filed pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-112-101 (Repl. 2016). The
circuit court dismissed Thompson’s petition for the writ because he was incarcerated in
Lincoln County when he initially filed his petition but was transferred to another unit before
the court entered its order. Specifically, Thompson had been transferred to the Grimes Unit
in Jackson County at the time the circuit court dismissed his petition on the basis of lack of
personal jurisdiction. In lieu of filing a responsive brief, appellee has filed a motion to dismiss
the appeal due to lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, a request for an extension of time
to file its responsive brief. Thompson has filed a pro se motion for default judgment on the basis of appellee’s failure to timely file a response, and a pro se motion to make a ruling
wherein he requests habeas relief. We grant the motion to dismiss, which renders
Thompson’s motion for default judgment and motion to make a ruling moot.
Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly
addressed to the circuit court located in the county where the prisoner is held in custody
unless the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001, codified at Arkansas Code
Annotated sections 16-112-201 to -208 (Repl. 2016). Perry v. State, 2018 Ark. 14, 535
S.W.3d 264. Although a circuit court may have subject-matter jurisdiction to issue the writ,
a court does not have personal jurisdiction to issue and make returnable before itself a writ
of habeas corpus to release a petitioner held in another county. Id. Arkansas Code Annotated
section 16-112-105(b)(1) (Repl. 2016) requires that the writ be directed to the person in
whose custody the petitioner is detained. Id. Accordingly, although Thompson was
incarcerated in Lincoln County when he filed the habeas petition, a writ of habeas corpus
issued by the Lincoln County Circuit Court could not be returned because he is no longer
within its jurisdiction. Id.
Appeal dismissed; pro se motion for default judgment moot; pro se motion to make
a ruling moot.
Zayzhon Thompson, pro se appellant.
Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Jacob H. Jones, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ark. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zayzhon-thompson-v-dexter-payne-director-arkansas-department-of-ark-2023.