ZAY MICHAEL BEY F/K/A TAMICHAEL L. FORDHAM v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel.,T. F. (CHILDREN)
This text of ZAY MICHAEL BEY F/K/A TAMICHAEL L. FORDHAM v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel.,T. F. (CHILDREN) (ZAY MICHAEL BEY F/K/A TAMICHAEL L. FORDHAM v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel.,T. F. (CHILDREN)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ January 08, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21A0792. ZAY MICHAEL BEY f/k/a TAMICHAEL L. FORDHAM v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, EX REL. T. F. et al. (CHILDREN).
Zay Michael Bey f/k/a Tamichael L. Fordham filed this direct appeal from the superior court’s order establishing his paternity of two minor children and requiring him to pay child support. We lack jurisdiction. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because this case involves paternity and the collection of child support, it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the statute. See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is a father’s obligation to provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by application”); Brown v. Dept. of Human Resources, 204 Ga. App. 27, 27 (418 SE2d 404) (1992) (“Appeals arising out of paternity petitions are domestic relations cases which require compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-35.”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Accordingly, Bey was required to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review of the superior court’s order. His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Booker, 317 Ga. App. at 427; Brown, 204 Ga. App. at 27.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/08/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ZAY MICHAEL BEY F/K/A TAMICHAEL L. FORDHAM v. THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Ex. Rel.,T. F. (CHILDREN), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zay-michael-bey-fka-tamichael-l-fordham-v-the-georgia-department-of-gactapp-2021.