Zavodsky v. Commercial Union Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zavodsky v. Commercial Union Insurance

262 A.D.2d 638, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 638 (Zavodsky v. Commercial Union Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zavodsky v. Commercial Union Insurance, 262 A.D.2d 638, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant Commercial Union Insurance Company from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated June 23, 1998, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 16, 1998, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 16, 1998, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 23, 1998, is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by the defendant Commercial Union Insurance Company from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated June 23, 1998, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 16, 1998, which denied its motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 16, 1998, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 23, 1998, is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 638, 691 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavodsky-v-commercial-union-insurance-nyappdiv-1999.