Zavier Comminey v. State
This text of Zavier Comminey v. State (Zavier Comminey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 2, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00892-CR ——————————— ZAVIER COMMINEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 14-CCR-175059
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Zavier Comminey, pled guilty to the misdemeanor offense of
possession of marijuana. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance
with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced
appellant to 50 days in jail. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial
court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West
2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification
showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the
record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id.
The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the
defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record
supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must
dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App.
2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an
appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must
dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the
appeal.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
2 Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zavier Comminey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavier-comminey-v-state-texapp-2016.