Zavelin v. Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zavelin v. Greenberg

49 A.D.3d 635, 852 N.Y.2d 778

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 635 (Zavelin v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zavelin v. Greenberg, 49 A.D.3d 635, 852 N.Y.2d 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The parties were divorced by a judgment dated February 8, 2007. The defendant filed a notice of appeal from the judgment, but subsequently withdrew that appeal on September 4, 2007. Thus, the appeal from the order must be dismissed. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The parties were divorced by a judgment dated February 8, 2007. The defendant filed a notice of appeal from the judgment, but subsequently withdrew that appeal on September 4, 2007. Thus, the appeal from the order must be dismissed. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.3d 635, 852 N.Y.2d 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavelin-v-greenberg-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack