Zavala v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided March 27, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00292·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

SALVADOR J. ZAVALA,

Plaintiff,

v. Civ. No. 24-292 GBW

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form). Doc. 2. For the reasons given below, Plaintiff’s Application is DENIED without prejudice. The statute governing proceedings in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), provides that the Court may authorize the commencement of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a description of all assets the person possesses as well as a statement that the person is unable to pay such fees. When a district court receives an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, it should examine the papers and determine if the requirements of [28 U.S.C.] § 1915(a) are satisfied. If they are, leave should be granted. Thereafter, if the court finds that the allegations of poverty are untrue or that the action is frivolous or malicious, it may dismiss the case[.]

Menefee v. Werholtz, 368 F. App’x 879, 884 (10th Cir. 2010) (unpublished) (quoting Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 60 (10th Cir. 1962)). “[A]n application to proceed in forma pauperis should be evaluated in light of the applicant’s present financial status.” Scherer v.

Kansas, 263 F. App’x 667, 669 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished) (citing Holmes v. Hardy, 852 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir. 1988)). “The statute [allowing a litigant to proceed in forma pauperis] was intended for the benefit of those too poor to pay or give security for

costs[.]” Adkins v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 344 (1948). While a litigant need not be “absolutely destitute,” “an affidavit is sufficient which states that one cannot because of his poverty pay or give security for the costs and still be able to

provide himself and dependents with the necessities of life.” Id. at 339. The Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis because it does not have sufficient information about Plaintiff’s monthly income to verify that Plaintiff is unable to pay the cost of the proceedings. If Plaintiff wishes to refile an

application to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff shall use the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (AO 239)1, and Plaintiff shall explicitly state his monthly income and monthly expenses.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED without prejudice as to the refiling of the application.

1 The AO 239 Form may be found at: https://www.uscourts.gov/forms/fee-waiver-application- forms/application-proceed-district-court-without-prepaying-fees-or Be B. WORMUTH CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zavala v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2024).

Zavala v. Social Security Administration (Zavala v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
335 U.S. 331 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Scherer v. State of Kansas
263 F. App'x 667 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
Menefee v. Werholtz
368 F. App'x 879 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)