Zavala v. Shevlin

52 A.D.3d 702, 858 N.Y.S.2d 897

This text of 52 A.D.3d 702 (Zavala v. Shevlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zavala v. Shevlin, 52 A.D.3d 702, 858 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered November 19, 2007, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her prima facie burden by showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact. Fisher, J.E, Florio, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Helen, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 33747(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.
774 N.E.2d 1197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Gaddy v. Eyler
591 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 702, 858 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavala-v-shevlin-nyappdiv-2008.