Zavala v. Quesada

443 P.3d 1128
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 12, 2019
DocketNo. 76592
StatusPublished

This text of 443 P.3d 1128 (Zavala v. Quesada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zavala v. Quesada, 443 P.3d 1128 (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial and order regarding a motion to retax costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerry A. Wiese, Judge.

This appeal was docketed in this court on August 3, 2018. Counsel for appellant's motion to withdraw was granted on January 24, 2019, and this court directed appellant to retain new counsel or to inform this court that she intended to proceed in pro se. Appellant failed to respond; accordingly, on March 26, 2019, this court entered an order reinstating the briefing schedule, and directing appellant to file her opening brief or informal brief for pro se parties within 30 days. Appellant failed to respond and failed to file the opening brief, and on June 4, 2019, this court entered another order directing appellant to file the opening brief within 14 days. This court's orders further cautioned appellant that failure to respond timely could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. Pursuant to the order, the brief was due by June 18, 2019. To date appellant has failed to file the opening brief or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, this court concludes that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 P.3d 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavala-v-quesada-nev-2019.