Zavala v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
886 So. 2d 319, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17046, 2004 WL 2534288
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3276·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zavala v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 886 So. 2d 319, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17046, 2004 WL 2534288 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 319 (Zavala v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hampton v. State
886 So. 2d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)