Zavala-Rubalcava v. Mukasey
This text of 283 F. App'x 443 (Zavala-Rubalcava v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s late appeal.
A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner’s notice of appeal to the BIA was not filed within 30 calendar days after the stating of the Immigration Judge’s oral decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 F. App'x 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavala-rubalcava-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.