Zavala-Rubalcava v. Mukasey

283 F. App'x 443
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2008·No. No. 08-71092·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s late appeal.

A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner’s notice of appeal to the BIA was not filed within 30 calendar days after the stating of the Immigration Judge’s oral decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zavala-Rubalcava v. Mukasey, 283 F. App'x 443 (9th Cir. 2008).

283 F. App'x 443 (Zavala-Rubalcava v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)