Zavaglia v. Notarbartolo
243 U.S. 628, 37 S. Ct. 403, 61 L. Ed. 936, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1584
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Company v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zavaglia v. Notarbartolo, 243 U.S. 628, 37 S. Ct. 403, 61 L. Ed. 936, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1584 (1917).
243 U.S. 628 (Zavaglia v. Notarbartolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon
223 U.S. 468 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)