Zatz v. Zatz

173 Misc. 229, 17 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2683
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 173 Misc. 229 (Zatz v. Zatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zatz v. Zatz, 173 Misc. 229, 17 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff may not maintain an action on the separation agreement for support and maintenance which by its terms was required to be and was incorporated in the divorce decree obtained by plaintiff. (See Breiterman v. Breiterman, 239 App. Div. 709, and Landes v. Landes, 172 id. 758.)

Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, plaintiff’s motion denied, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Hammer and Shientag, JJ., concur; Noonan, J., dissents.

Noonan, J. I dissent and vote for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howland v. Stitzer
84 S.E.2d 167 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Jaeckel v. Jaeckel
179 Misc. 994 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Misc. 229, 17 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zatz-v-zatz-nyappterm-1940.