Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

52 A.D.2d 658, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12320

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 1976·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted, without costs, to the extent that the decretal paragraph of the decision and order is amended to read as follows: "Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the second, third and fourth causes of action, with costs to appellants to abide the event.” Motion, in all other respects, denied, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument granted, without costs, to the extent that the decretal paragraph of the decision and order is amended to read as follows: "Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the second, third and fourth causes of action, with costs to appellants to abide the event.” Motion, in all other respects, denied, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Kane, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 52 A.D.2d 658, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

52 A.D.2d 658 (Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.