Zarrello v. Zarrello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zarrello v. Zarrello

66 A.D.2d 678, 410 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 678 (Zarrello v. Zarrello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zarrello v. Zarrello, 66 A.D.2d 678, 410 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1978, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony of $100 per week, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Our affirmance should not be construed as any indication of our view as regards the amount of, or, indeed, the wife's entitlement to, permanent alimony, or even as to a motion for modification of temporary alimony due to substantial changed circumstances. The issue of permanent alimony should be fully explored at trial and determined in accordance with the statutory criteria (Domestic Relations Law, § 236). We remain of the view that a trial at the earliest possible date provides the forum most appropriate to a resolution of this type of dispute. ConcurLupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lynch and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 13, 1978, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony of $100 per week, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Our affirmance should not be construed as any indication of our view as regards the amount of, or, indeed, the wife's entitlement to, permanent alimony, or even as to a motion for modification of temporary alimony due to substantial changed circumstances. The issue of permanent alimony should be fully explored at trial and determined in accordance with the statutory criteria (Domestic Relations Law, § 236). We remain of the view that a trial at the earliest possible date provides the forum most appropriate to a resolution of this type of dispute. ConcurLupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lynch and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 678, 410 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zarrello-v-zarrello-nyappdiv-1978.