Zarina Holding C v. And Baracuda International Corporation, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Aqua Products, Inc.

40 F.3d 1249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zarina Holding C v. And Baracuda International Corporation, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Aqua Products, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 F.3d 443
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 8, 1994·No. 94-1404·Unpublished

Opinion

40 F.3d 1249

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ZARINA HOLDING C.V. and Baracuda International Corporation,
Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants,
v.
AQUA PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 94-1404, 94-1405.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1994.

D.N.J.

APPEAL REACTIVATED.

ORDER

On consideration of the notice of appeal, a motion of the type enumerated in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4) having been filed in the United States District Court/NEW JERSEY rendering the notice of appeal ineffective, it is

ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, DEACTIVATED.

The appeal will be REACTIVATED upon entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zarina Holding C v. And Baracuda International Corporation, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Aqua Products, Inc., 40 F.3d 1249, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 25980 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

40 F.3d 1249 (Zarina Holding C v. And Baracuda International Corporation, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Aqua Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.