Zaretsky v. Hitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zaretsky v. Hitt

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 718 (Zaretsky v. Hitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zaretsky v. Hitt, 54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt which denied petitioner’s application for a permit for the construction of a multiple-family residential development, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 9, 1974, as, upon reargument, directed a hearing as to the issue whether petitioner had obtained a vested right and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 11, 1975, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed the petition. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, and judgment affirmed, all without costs or disbursements. The record supports the finding of Special Term that the respondents were not guilty of willfully withholding approval of appellant’s application. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to review a determination of the respondent Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt which denied petitioner’s application for a permit for the construction of a multiple-family residential development, the appeal is from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 9, 1974, as, upon reargument, directed a hearing as to the issue whether petitioner had obtained a vested right and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered April 11, 1975, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed the petition. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, and judgment affirmed, all without costs or disbursements. The record supports the finding of Special Term that the respondents were not guilty of willfully withholding approval of appellant’s application. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaretsky-v-hitt-nyappdiv-1976.