Zaremba v. Albano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zaremba v. Albano

212 A.D.2d 692, 623 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 692 (Zaremba v. Albano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zaremba v. Albano, 212 A.D.2d 692, 623 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter [693]*693alia, to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered December 16, 1992, which is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $122,701.80.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the decision of the Supreme Court, following a nonjury trial, is supported by the record. Further, the court did not err in crediting the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert regarding his appraisal of the parties’ business.

We have examined the defendants’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter [693]*693alia, to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), entered December 16, 1992, which is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $122,701.80.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the decision of the Supreme Court, following a nonjury trial, is supported by the record. Further, the court did not err in crediting the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert regarding his appraisal of the parties’ business.

We have examined the defendants’ remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 692, 623 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaremba-v-albano-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack