Zarchen v. Zarchen

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Zarchen v. Zarchen

7 R.I. Dec. 105

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 23, 1931

DocketEq. No. 10572

StatusPublished

This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 105 (Zarchen v. Zarchen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zarchen v. Zarchen, 7 R.I. Dec. 105 (R.I. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion to vacate a decree of this Court entered December 13, 1930, ordering certain goods consigned to Zarchen & Markoff by the Converse Rubber Company returned to said company and that same be returned to receivers.

The order was entered December 13, 1930, and the goods returned to the Converse Rubber Company.

The motion to vacate was not filed until January 6, 1931, and in the meantime the Zarchen & Markoff matter [106]*106has been taken into the United States District Court upon a petition to declare the copartners bankrupt, which matter is now pending in said Court.

For complainant: Morris Berick. For respondents: Michael F. Costello.

The motion to vacate said order oí December 13, 1930, is denied and the matter is left with the Court now having jurisdiction for its determination without prejudice to the rights of the creditors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, P. J.

Heard upon motion to vacate a decree of this Court entered December 13, 1930, ordering certain goods consigned to Zarchen & Markoff by the Converse Rubber Company returned to said company and that same be returned to receivers.

The order was entered December 13, 1930, and the goods returned to the Converse Rubber Company.

The motion to vacate was not filed until January 6, 1931, and in the meantime the Zarchen & Markoff matter [106]*106has been taken into the United States District Court upon a petition to declare the copartners bankrupt, which matter is now pending in said Court.

For complainant: Morris Berick. For respondents: Michael F. Costello.

The motion to vacate said order oí December 13, 1930, is denied and the matter is left with the Court now having jurisdiction for its determination without prejudice to the rights of the creditors.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 R.I. Dec. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zarchen-v-zarchen-risuperct-1931.