Zaragoza Hernandez v. Mukasey
This text of 305 F. App'x 392 (Zaragoza Hernandez v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Antonio Zaragoza Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) reissued order sustaining the Department of Homeland Security’s appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his application for cancellation of removal. We grant respondent’s unopposed motion to supplement the administrative record. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over Zaragoza Hernandez’s petition for review because it was filed more than 30 days after the BIA’s reissued decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Zaragoza Hernandez has not established that he was misled about the need for a timely petition for review of the reissued decision or that the BIA improperly mailed its reissued decision to him. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188-89 (9th Cir.2003) (court lacked jurisdiction over late petition where BIA mailed decision to petitioner’s address of record and counsel had not filed a notice of appearance with the BIA).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaragoza-hernandez-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.