Zara Contracting Co. v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zara Contracting Co. v. New York Telephone Co.

13 A.D.2d 1002, 218 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 1002 (Zara Contracting Co. v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zara Contracting Co. v. New York Telephone Co., 13 A.D.2d 1002, 218 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for extra work, labor and services necessitated by failure of defendant to relocate its underground facilities in accordance with notice of forthcoming sewer construction, the [1003]*1003defendant appeals from an order of the Supremo Court, Nassau County, dated September 27, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to answer the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for extra work, labor and services necessitated by failure of defendant to relocate its underground facilities in accordance with notice of forthcoming sewer construction, the [1003]*1003defendant appeals from an order of the Supremo Court, Nassau County, dated September 27, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to answer the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 1002, 218 N.Y.S.2d 946, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zara-contracting-co-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappdiv-1961.