Zara Contracting Co. v. City of Glen Cove

22 Misc. 2d 279, 197 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3810
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 Misc. 2d 279 (Zara Contracting Co. v. City of Glen Cove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zara Contracting Co. v. City of Glen Cove, 22 Misc. 2d 279, 197 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3810 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Frank A. Gulotta, J.

This is an application by a taxpayer to intervene in a lawsuit being conducted by the municipality of which he is a taxpayer, because he differs with its officials on how the litigation should be handled. He does not show that he has any special interest in the action differing from that of other taxpayers and hence does not bring himself within the provisions of section 193-b of the Civil Practice Act as interpreted in the case of Town of Irondequoit v. Monroe County (171 Misc. 125).

[280]*280The suit involves work done in paving a parking field which the City Engineer has certified to have been done properly.

Public officials necessarily are vested with a certain amount of discretion in reaching decisions in a great many areas. It does not follow that they must resist paying for work which they believe to have been fairly and honestly done, even though there might exist some technical defense to a demand for payment.

They may be called to account for fraud or collusion under section 51 of the General Municipal Law, but absent these elements, the petitioner may not interfere with their prerogative to manage the affairs of the city duly intrusted to them by the voters of that city. Any other rule could result in allowing each taxpayer to intervene and voice his views which would lead to a most chaotic situation.

Application denied. Short-form order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spota v. County of Suffolk
110 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Unitarian Universalist Church v. Shorten
64 Misc. 2d 851 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Horn Construction Co. v. Town of Hempstead
33 Misc. 2d 381 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Misc. 2d 279, 197 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zara-contracting-co-v-city-of-glen-cove-nysupct-1960.