Zappolo v. Putnam Hospital Center

117 A.D.2d 597, 498 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52871
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 117 A.D.2d 597 (Zappolo v. Putnam Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zappolo v. Putnam Hospital Center, 117 A.D.2d 597, 498 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Beisheim, J.), dated April 9, 1985, as denied that branch of its motion which was to strike the answer of defendant Putnam Hospital Center or, in the alternative, to compel compliance with their notice to take the oral deposition of that defendant and with certain prior orders of the same court concerning disclosure by it, with leave to plaintiffs to take the oral examination of any former medical personnel of that defendant.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term properly denied the branch of plaintiffs’ motion which was to strike the answer of the defendant hospital or, alternatively, to direct the hospital to submit to a further examination before trial. It appears that the hospital has complied, to the extent possible, with plaintiffs’ notice and with the prior orders directing it to submit to an examination before trial. However, most of the medical personnel having personal knowledge of decedent’s case are no longer employed by the defendant hospital and it cannot be compelled to produce its former employees for an examination before trial (see, Frankel v French & Polyclinic Med. School & Health Center, 70 AD2d 947). Thus, plaintiffs must proceed to examine such persons in the manner provided for nonparty witnesses (CPLR 3106 [a]).

Finally, plaintiffs’ claim that the order appealed from effectively overruled a prior order made by a court of coordinate jurisdiction is of no avail on this appeal, inasmuch as the doctrine of the " Taw of the case’ ” does not bind an appellate court (Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165; Wilson v McCarthy, 53 AD2d 860). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HANN, RICHARD v. BLACK, STEPHEN R.
96 A.D.3d 1503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Da Cruz v. Towmasters of New Jersey, Inc.
22 A.D.3d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Latture v. Smith
304 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Souffrant v. Star Insurance
300 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Schneider v. Melmarkets Inc.
289 A.D.2d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Keith v. Schulman
265 A.D.2d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Fabbricatore v. Lindenhurst Union Free School District
259 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
D'Guardia v. Piffath
180 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Garguilio v. Garguilio
168 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Post v. Post
141 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Kress
131 A.D.2d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Cherry v. Koch
126 A.D.2d 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Friedman v. Lupatkin
125 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Gray v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals
123 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A.D.2d 597, 498 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zappolo-v-putnam-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1986.