Zappala v. Caroselli Beachler McTiernan & Conboy

97 A.3d 730
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 6, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.3d 730 (Zappala v. Caroselli Beachler McTiernan & Conboy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zappala v. Caroselli Beachler McTiernan & Conboy, 97 A.3d 730 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of August 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the voluntary and unilateral dismissal of Petitioner without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)© was a termination of the underlying proceedings in Petitioner’s favor, such that Petitioner could state a claim in a Dra-gonetti action?
Justices SAYLOR, TODD and McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.3d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zappala-v-caroselli-beachler-mctiernan-conboy-pa-2014.