Zappa v. Ewing

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Zappa v. Ewing

160 S.E.2d 640, 117 Ga. App. 362, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1089

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 5, 1968

Docket43416

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 S.E.2d 640 (Zappa v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zappa v. Ewing, 160 S.E.2d 640, 117 Ga. App. 362, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1089 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Zappa took this appeal from the judgment of the.trial court denying his motion to add Allstate Insurance Company as a party defendant. This motion did not attempt to assert a third party claim against Allstate under Code Ann. § 81A-114 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 627). The judgment appealed from was not a final judgment or one which would have been final if rendered as contended for by appellant. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18); Smith v. Winer, 219 Ga. 738 (135 SE2d 892). It follows that the appeal must be

Dismissed.

Bell, P. J., Hall and Quillian, JJ., concur. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Gambrell, Russell, Moye & Killorin, Edward W. Killorin, David A. Handley, H. B. Thompson, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant Zappa took this appeal from the judgment of the.trial court denying his motion to add Allstate Insurance Company as a party defendant. This motion did not attempt to assert a third party claim against Allstate under Code Ann. § 81A-114 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 627). The judgment appealed from was not a final judgment or one which would have been final if rendered as contended for by appellant. Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18); Smith v. Winer, 219 Ga. 738 (135 SE2d 892). It follows that the appeal must be

Dismissed.

Bell, P. J., Hall and Quillian, JJ., concur. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Gambrell, Russell, Moye & Killorin, Edward W. Killorin, David A. Handley, H. B. Thompson, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.E.2d 640, 117 Ga. App. 362, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zappa-v-ewing-gactapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack