Zapf v. State

44 N.E. 1119, 145 Ind. 696, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 117
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 19, 1896
DocketNo. 17,772
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 N.E. 1119 (Zapf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zapf v. State, 44 N.E. 1119, 145 Ind. 696, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 117 (Ind. 1896).

Opinion

Jordan, J.

— The appellant was convicted upon an indictment which charged that on the 4th day of July, 1895, he being duly licensed under the laws of this State to sell intoxicating liquors, did then and there unlawfully suffer and permit in his saloon certain persons named, who were not members of his family. This prosecution was based upon section 3 of an Act approved March 11, 1895, (Acts of 1895, p. 248).

The questions herein presented were considered and decided adversely to appellant in the case of The State v. Gerhardt, ante, 439, and upon the authority of that decision the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Commissioners v. Scanlan
98 N.E. 801 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.E. 1119, 145 Ind. 696, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zapf-v-state-ind-1896.