Zapf v. Carter
77 N.Y.S. 1143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zapf v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 A.D. 395 →
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted, the following question to be certified to that court, viz.: Did the defendant (Lulu N. Carter) and Margaret Spalsbury hold the premises described in the complaint adversely for 20 years prior to the commencement of this action, and did such adverse holding ripen into a perfect title in said Lulu N. Carter?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zapf v. Carter, 77 N.Y.S. 1143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).
77 N.Y.S. 1143 (Zapf v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.