Zapf v. Anderson

157 So. 2d 866
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 27, 1963
DocketNo. 3682
StatusPublished

This text of 157 So. 2d 866 (Zapf v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zapf v. Anderson, 157 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

W. C. Zapf, plaintiff and counter-defendant below appeals an order of circuit court declaring certain municipal tax deeds void for lack of proper execution and lack of proper notice. We find no error.

Sections 194.43 and 194.44, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. apply also to municipalities and require strict compliance. See also McLeod v. Williams, 1917, 73 Fla. 338, 74 So. 408, 410; Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of Monticello, 1947, 159 Fla. 134, 31 So.2d 905; cf. § 14 (35) Chapter 57-1331, Acts of 1957, Charter of the City of Fort Pierce.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Certain Lots Upon Which Taxes Are Delinquent v. Town of Monticello
31 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
McLeod v. Williams
74 So. 408 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zapf-v-anderson-fladistctapp-1963.