Zapata v. Middleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zapata v. Middleton

197 A.D.2d 526, 604 N.Y.S.2d 741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 526 (Zapata v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zapata v. Middleton, 197 A.D.2d 526, 604 N.Y.S.2d 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal [527]*527is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.), dated April 15, 1991, which directed that the appellant be imprisoned for 6 months for nonpayment of child support.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant has already served his sentence of incarceration imposed under Family Court Act § 454 (3) (a), his challenges to the order of the Family Court are rendered academic (see, Matter of Madison County Support Collection Unit v Drennan, 156 AD2d 883; Ward v Ward, 71 AD2d 854). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal [527]*527is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Esquirol, J.), dated April 15, 1991, which directed that the appellant be imprisoned for 6 months for nonpayment of child support.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the appellant has already served his sentence of incarceration imposed under Family Court Act § 454 (3) (a), his challenges to the order of the Family Court are rendered academic (see, Matter of Madison County Support Collection Unit v Drennan, 156 AD2d 883; Ward v Ward, 71 AD2d 854). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 526, 604 N.Y.S.2d 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zapata-v-middleton-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack